CO129-177 - Sir Kennedy Acting Governor Austin Lieut Governor Hennessy - 1877 [1-5] — Page 11

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

period, unless broken before the end and the first period notice is given to the tenant that the land is required for public purposes. His Lordship stated that the leases should be subject to such terms & conditions as the Governor determines, including the stipulation that except with the previous consent in writing of the Governor land is not to be used for other than assigned purposes, nor be sublet, and that at the termination of the lease by efflux of time, but not by act of forfeiture, the tenant shall be allowed a reasonable period, such as 3 months, to remove any growing crops then on the land.

I presume that the garden leases in question are framed in accordance with these instructions. But it is a pity that the Governor should have sent home the present application without comment and without any copy of a garden lease or of a farm lease to show the differences between the two. We have never had or seen a copy of either lease – being unable therefore to say what are the rents and conditions comprised in each. But judging from the information at hand

30 Dec 76

I do not think that the Petitioners have made out a sufficient case for what they ask. It is clear from the instructions issued by Lord Kimberley that it was not intended that garden leases should be converted into building leases (one of the objects the Petitioners have in view) other than by stipulation. They were to contain a stipulation that without the previous written consent of the Governor the land was not to be used for garden purposes. It may also reasonably be inferred from the official reply given to the Petitioners that the Governor's opinion is not favourable to their request, and that he doubted whether the policy of letting Crown land at Kowloon on short leases – which had been deliberately adopted – should now be changed, or was justified even in submitting their petition to the Secretary of State. This is in accordance with the decided opinion expressed in his despatch of 10 July

Edit History

2026-05-21 15:00:56 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
period, unless broken before the end and the first period notice is given to the tenant that the land is required for public purposes. His Lordship stated that the leases should be subject to such terms & conditions as the Governor determines, including the stipulation that except with the previous consent in writing of the Governor land is not to be used for other than assigned purposes, nor be sublet, and that at the termination of the lease by efflux of time, but not by act of forfeiture, the tenant shall be allowed a reasonable period, such as 3 months, to remove any growing crops then on the land. I presume that the garden leases in question are framed in accordance with these instructions. But it is a pity that the Governor should have sent home the present application without comment and without any copy of a garden lease or of a farm lease to show the differences between the two. We have never had or seen a copy of either lease being unable therefore to say what are the rents and conditions comprised in each. But judging from the information at hand 30 Dec 76 I do not think that the Petitioners have made out a sufficient case for what they ask. It is clear from the instructions issued by Lord Kimberley that it was not intended that garden leases should be converted into building leases (one of the objects the Petitioners have in view) other than by stipulation. They were to contain a stipulation that without the previous written consent of the Governor the land was not to be used for garden purposes. It may also reasonably be inferred from the official reply given to the Petitioners that the Governor's opinion is not favourable to their request, and that he doubted whether the policy of letting Crown land at Kowloon on short leases which had been deliberately adopted should now be changed, or was justified even in submitting their petition to the Secretary of State. This is in accordance with the decided opinion expressed in his despatch of 10 July
Baseline (Original)
"period, unless brontles before the and the first period notice is given to the tenant that the band is required for public purposes . His Lordship astated that the leases should be subject to such reals & conditions as the Governor determine, including the stipu= =lation that sxeeph with the previous the Governor consent in writing of land is not to be used for other than apsigned may fardon purposes, nor the indeleh, and that at the terminations of the lease by opplux of time. but act of forfeiture _ the tenant shall in case be allowed a reasonable period, such as 3. Monthy, to remove any growing Ter. crops then on the land. - spresume that the garden leases in questions. are framed in accord -ance with these instructions. Butitio a pity that the Governon should have sent home the present application without comment and without any copy of a garden Lease or of a farm. differences betweew lease to show the the two. We have never had or seen a copy of either lease Dam unable therefore to say what are the rents and conditions comprized in rack. But judging from the information at hand 30 Des76 10 I do not think that the Petitioners cxle have made out a sufficient for what they ask. It is clear prone "the instinctions issued by Lord Kimberley that it was acour intended that garden leases should be converted the into building leases (one of objects the Detitioners have in view) stipulation. ar other than they were to contain a that without the previous written consent of the Governor the land was not to be used for garden purposes. It may also reasonably be inferred from the official reply gives to the prtitioners that the Governor's opinion is not favourable to there request, doubted whether the policy of letting af Se Grown land at Kowloon on shorts leases- which had brew deliberately adopted, should nor be changed, justified even indeed whether he was in submitting their patition to the Secretary of State. This is in accord = =ance with the decided opinion be expereped in his despatch of 10. July
2026-05-21 15:00:56 · Baseline
View content

"period, unless brontles before the and the first period notice is given to the tenant that the band is required for public purposes . His Lordship astated that the leases should be subject to such reals & conditions as the Governor determine, including the stipu= =lation that sxeeph with the previous

the Governor consent in writing of land is not to be used for other than

apsigned

may

fardon purposes, nor

the

indeleh, and that at the terminations

of the lease by opplux of time. but act of forfeiture _ the tenant shall

in case be allowed a reasonable period, such

as 3. Monthy, to remove any growing

Ter.

crops

then on the land.

-

spresume that the garden

leases in questions.

are

framed in accord -ance with these instructions. Butitio a pity that the

Governon

should have

sent home the present application

without comment and without

any

copy of a garden Lease or of a farm. differences betweew

lease to show the

the two. We have never had or seen a copy of either lease – Dam unable therefore to say what are the rents and conditions comprized in rack. But judging from the information at hand

30 Des76

10

I do not think that the Petitioners

cxle

have made out a sufficient for what they ask. It is clear prone "the instinctions issued by Lord Kimberley

that it was acour intended that garden leases should be converted

the into building leases (one of objects the Detitioners have in view)

stipulation.

ar

other than

they were to contain a that without the previous written consent of the Governor the land was not to be used for garden purposes. It may also reasonably be inferred from the official reply gives to the prtitioners that the Governor's opinion is not favourable to there request, doubted whether the policy of letting

af

Se

Grown land at Kowloon on shorts leases- which had brew deliberately adopted, should nor be changed,

justified even indeed whether he was

in submitting their patition to the Secretary of State. This is in accord = =ance with the decided opinion be expereped in his despatch of 10. July

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.